Idea → MVP in 4 weeks
Turn your idea into a focused MVP without wasting time and budget on the wrong features. I define the core users and flows, then handle design, development, testing, and launch.
Discuss your idea
I help founders build secure, tested web apps designed to grow, without having to start over a few months later.
Turn your idea into a focused MVP without wasting time and budget on the wrong features. I define the core users and flows, then handle design, development, testing, and launch.
Discuss your ideaYour finished app should feel as polished as the Figma design. I preserve the layout, spacing, typography, colors, and interactions, complete responsive behavior and missing states, then connect everything to working product logic.
Discuss your designAI prototypes can look finished while hiding broken flows, fragile data, and security gaps. I review the foundation, fix or rebuild only what is necessary, and prepare the product to work reliably for real users.
Discuss your prototypeI have over 10 years of experience building web products. Today I integrate advanced AI agents into my process to build faster without giving up control over product decisions, data, security, or architecture. The result is a web app ready for real customers, not just a demo.
01.
I help non-technical founders turn ideas into a realistic build plan: what to prioritize, what is technically complex, what to simplify, and what needs to happen next.
02.
I've built the first versions of SaaS platforms, matching systems, and products used by thousands of people. Some of those products now serve hundreds of thousands of users and have raised millions in funding.
03.
You talk directly with me. Decisions happen fast, with no PM handoffs or message chains.
04.
I do not disappear after launch. If something needs to be fixed or improved, you have a direct point of contact who knows the product and can step in without starting from scratch.
A complete web app with secure access, a well-structured database, automated tests, error monitoring, safe deployments, and code you own.

"Within 1-2 calls we knew Nicola was the CTO our company needed. He doesn't just deliver, he actively challenges our briefings and makes the platform better than initially planned."
The starting point changes. Every project follows the same path from planning to launch.
During a one-week planning phase, I review your starting point and define users, flows, requirements, risks, and scope in a PRD and delivery plan.
From an idea, I create the key screens and prototype. With Figma or an existing prototype, I review, complete, and validate the flows, states, and responsive behavior before development.
I build the agreed features in working increments. You follow progress in staging, test each part, and provide feedback as the product takes shape.
I test core flows, security, and quality, fix launch blockers, deploy the app, and hand over code, configuration, and access.
Choose the way of working that fits your product: a fixed-scope project or ongoing monthly development.
For a clearly defined outcome: a new MVP, a Figma build, or preparing an existing prototype for real users.
Starting at
$6,000
The final price is confirmed after Product Planning or a technical audit ($700). That fee is deducted from the project.
For continuously building, improving, or maintaining a product without defining a new fixed scope each time.
$3,000/month
For building new features, improving existing ones, and evolving the product sprint by sprint.
It depends on how clearly the work can be defined:
We choose the right model after the free call.
For a fixed-price project, I first complete Product Planning for a new app or a technical audit for an existing product.
The $700 fee is deducted from the project price if we move forward.
Yes. I build the app so your team can handle normal operations without touching code.
For new features, logic changes or integrations, you can bring me back in.
Possibly. If the database, queries, authentication, or application structure are fragile, rebuilding the foundation is often safer and faster than modifying interconnected parts.
The decision comes from the technical audit, based on cost, risk, and continuity.